Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of June 2013. Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil.
Related posts
-
CA: Assembly Approves AB 1568, potentially blocking many registrants from petitioning for registry removal
Source: ACSOL The California Assembly has voted in support of Assembly Bill (AB) 1568 on May... -
Hinda Institute’s “Navigating the System” course: Effective advocacy within the court system and behind prison walls
Source: hindahelps.com On June 3, 10, and 17, 2026 the Hinda Institute’s “Navigating the System” course... -
TX: Tough-On-Crime Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office offers sex offense plea deals
Source: texastribune.org 5/19/26 WACO — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is under fire for a plea deal his prosecutors offered...
@ Mike.
The sentencing in the Idaho case you linked should come as no surprise, because that is the norm. Female SO’s sentences are almost always much less than their male counterparts, and on par with the sentences (if any) of law enforcement gone bad, when they’re caught. The judge in this case seems to be an idiot, differentiating between male/female and forgetting the seriousness of the crime. Had a male committed the acts he would have gotten that mandatory minimum, probably 20+ years.